FieryArien
Necromancer
This is very interesting thread and I’m closely watching it to gain some insight.
I do notice significant difference between my two cities. My main is in Woodelves and my young one hasn’t reached guest races yet. Here’s what I see in recent tournament:
- In early provinces my older city has significantly harder enemy setup. While the young city gets a lot of fights consisting of just light ranged+melee units which can be both taken down by heavy ranged unit, my older city almost always gets also heavy melee unit(s) in the mix.
- On the other hand, my 3* units in the older city are usually able to handle these mixed fights in early provinces effectively even on auto-fight (app-player here!).
- Also the higher provinces feature units with up to 3* and there my young city with 1-2* units has no chance to win (or win reasonably), so the easier early provinces might be a balancing act.
My personal conclusion, how I FEEL this (since I don’t provide any math to back up my conclusion) is:
- The tournaments DO GET HARDER AS MY CITY ADVANCES. However, I’m also getting better by adding stars to my units. After that I should be getting better by utilizing Training Grounds/Mercenary Camp units (once they upgrade a star or two). I should also be getting better by utilizing some wonders to improve my troops effectiveness. The game seems to be expecting it from me in order to improve/keep my tournament performance.
- On the other hand, I don’t believe tournaments would get harder if I stayed put and stopped developing my city altogether.
PS: CleverAngel777, I don’t think the other people are trying to attack you. They might have different priorities (but they are clear about their point of view) and they are backing up their claims with math and experiences. You are not forced to follow their advice. However, others can, if they want. Personally, I’d like to hear why your strategy is better, because I failed to notice or failed to understand your priorities so far. (That’s where is boils down to: game priorities and style.)
I do notice significant difference between my two cities. My main is in Woodelves and my young one hasn’t reached guest races yet. Here’s what I see in recent tournament:
- In early provinces my older city has significantly harder enemy setup. While the young city gets a lot of fights consisting of just light ranged+melee units which can be both taken down by heavy ranged unit, my older city almost always gets also heavy melee unit(s) in the mix.
- On the other hand, my 3* units in the older city are usually able to handle these mixed fights in early provinces effectively even on auto-fight (app-player here!).
- Also the higher provinces feature units with up to 3* and there my young city with 1-2* units has no chance to win (or win reasonably), so the easier early provinces might be a balancing act.
My personal conclusion, how I FEEL this (since I don’t provide any math to back up my conclusion) is:
- The tournaments DO GET HARDER AS MY CITY ADVANCES. However, I’m also getting better by adding stars to my units. After that I should be getting better by utilizing Training Grounds/Mercenary Camp units (once they upgrade a star or two). I should also be getting better by utilizing some wonders to improve my troops effectiveness. The game seems to be expecting it from me in order to improve/keep my tournament performance.
- On the other hand, I don’t believe tournaments would get harder if I stayed put and stopped developing my city altogether.
PS: CleverAngel777, I don’t think the other people are trying to attack you. They might have different priorities (but they are clear about their point of view) and they are backing up their claims with math and experiences. You are not forced to follow their advice. However, others can, if they want. Personally, I’d like to hear why your strategy is better, because I failed to notice or failed to understand your priorities so far. (That’s where is boils down to: game priorities and style.)