• Good day, Stranger! — Are you new to our forums?

    Have I seen you here before? To participate in or to create forum discussions, you will need your own forum account. Register your account here!

Diamond cost reduction?

Hekata

Artisan
These Inno Black Friday offers always give me a good chuckle :D

lol £50 for Air traders set, I disenchanted it today, £50 worth of stuff. £75 for Gingerbread Mansion or Mermaids Paradise, really??? Hmm, so do I get 2 Mermaids Paradise or a small LED TV... choices, choices lol. Ridiculous!!!
I just checked and today, with the Black Friday sales, I could buy a 32" TV for the price of 1 mermaid, for the price of 2 I could can get a 43" one :)
 

Silmaril

Community Manager
Elvenar Team
So as I am not a legal specialist by any stretch if the imagination. I have consulted with our legal team this afternoon to get you the following clarification:

Competition law on discounts/rebates applies regardless of whether the product in question is a physical good or a virtual good.
Regardless of whether the item is a physical or virtual good, we need to make sure that the original price is accurate (Sec. 5 (1) No. 2 UWG), which it is.

The original price is accurate if

  • The original price has actually been charged in the past (for an item that has been sold before).
  • The original price will be charged in the future for at least several weeks or months (for an item that has never been on offer before, such as this building).
  • If the price is fixed and assigned in internal pricing lists (for sale-only items).
We assign every item a value once it gets created for whichever purpose. Every event item has a specific value assigned to it. That value is kept consistently from its creation until the items go on sale. We are not exempt from applying inflation, etc, to these set prices, but in practice this is barely done.
 

DeletedUser6472

Guest
If this company really made an effort of offering something good to us, as so many companies do during this period of year, I'm sure that many of us would be tempted to spend a little something. Many of us spending a little something is better, than none of us spending big... A new addition to the list of ridiculousness: 1 pet food for 350 diamonds, lol I have no words...
 

Far Reach

Conjurer
So as I am not a legal specialist by any stretch if the imagination. I have consulted with our legal team this afternoon to get you the following clarification:

It is somewhat off topic, but I came across an NDA online for another of Inno's games. The gist is that Grepolis seems to have experimented with elected player representatives (to talk to developers of behalf of the players) and a legal non-disclosure agreement was prepared for these players reps which was apparently intended to prevent them feeding back anything to the players without prior approval in writing. This seemed a bit extreme to me, and perhaps explains much of the difficulty we have in getting any meaningful engagement with the devs on many topics (e.g. tournament changes).

I can understand Inno not wanting to discuss details of how they make money from their games (although a great deal is available online if you look hard), but this NDA still seems a bit heavy handed. I really don't understand why they aren't prepared to discuss game mechanics related issues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alcaro

Necromancer
I've read that NDA :D sorry, I laughed ... Grepolis doesn't have a forum? The opinions, suggestions aso can't be read there? They need a council of players? How those representatives of players will decide which idea to be forwarded to devs, which not? LOL!!!
 

Gargon667

Mentor
I'd be interested to see InnoGames defend that in a court of law. Not that I wish to see that, of course, because I don't want to see the game I love take that type of a hit.

It would be like me producing a product. Let's say I'm making Christmas wreaths and then selling them. I could sit here and work out a complex algorithm to decide what I consider to be the possible value of these Christmas wreaths to potential customers. I could decide that value is £20. There's nothing wrong with that. My choice... but if I put them straight on sale for £15 and announced that was a 25% discount, I would be prevented from making that advertisement within minutes... and if I continued, I would be prosecuted.

As for Inno's valuations - I know that even if this is a legal loophole that works for them in Germany, the valuation would no doubt still need to be substantiated. We can use our old friend the portal profit spell, which we discussed recently in relation to the crafting value that they place on these. I said at the time, and I still maintain, there isn't a single player who would consider a 20% portal profit spell to be worth 10 combining catalysts. There's nothing wrong with it because that's all just moving in-game resources around, but today InnoGames have put a dollar/pound value on portal profit spells by attempting to sell them for 1,440 diamonds for a 50% spell. To see them defend the claim that this is a sale including a 10% discount would be fun.

The question is if they do anything illegal at all, I doubt they are. Most likely their algorithm has said it´s worth 1000, and it has said so for a year and a half now. So now they reduce the price by 20%. In the end even if someone would bother trying this in a court they´d probabaly get told not to do this again, if (and that´s a big if) anyone found anything wrong at all. I am pretty sure they would have asked their lawyers if they can do this or not legally or at least without getting punished for it. So I would say it´s rather safe to say they´ll never get punished for it.

Btw I would say this 800 diamonds for a DA has been the best of all the offers so far today, not that I am going to do that, I figured it let´s me flip the MA 16 times for that, I am more likely to get more good stuff from that than from 1 DA. But at least I considered it, which is rather rare for these kinds of deals that i usually don´t even bother looking at.

The evolving buildings are a hilarious offer :D, but it shows how useless their pricing algorithm is, so it may be worth keeping an eye on it, something may slip through at some point. Out of those 4 or 5 offers the cheapest one (of course still way overpriced) is by far the best one. The Yeti Santa Set, beats all the other stuff and costs less than half. Well the mermaids of course are good for FAs, but for the kind of money they are asking??? I might spend 5 euros (or maybe 1000 diamonds) if I´m in a generous mood for a christmas donation to Inno, but this is stretching it a bit far. They can´t target regular players with these offers, they must target either newbies that have no idea of the value of a building or people that have so much money they really don´t care what it costs.
 

CrazyWizard

Shaman
It is somewhat off topic, but I came across an NDA online for another of Inno's games. The gist is that Grepolis seems to have experimented with elected player representatives (to talk to developers of behalf of the players) and a legal non-disclosure agreement was prepared for these players reps which was apparently intended to prevent them feeding back anything to the players without prior approval in writing. This seemed a bit extreme to me, and perhaps explains much of the difficulty we have in getting any meaningful engagement with the devs on many topics (e.g. tournament changes).

I can understand Inno not wanting to discuss details of how they make money from their games (although a great deal is available online if you look hard), but this NDA still seems a bit heavy handed. I really don't understand why they aren't prepared to discuss game mechanics related issues.

I havent read the NDA do you have a link?
On the other hand it makes sense to have an NDA when you get access to information about the development process.

Just 1 simple example for why an NDA is needed is lets say they discuss a cool feature and those people share that with players.
Then it turns out that feature is impossible / to expensive to implement, now everyone expects that feature, and is very dissapointed.

Or a change is planned and that change is not beneficial for a sale you had planned, now people do not buy your product because they know it's not a good offer because they have information earlier then you want.

there are 2 simple examples of why NDA's are needed even if it's only about developement.
 

Far Reach

Conjurer
I havent read the NDA do you have a link?

I originally posted the link, but my post was edited by the moderators to remove it. I wasn't aware that I had infringed any rules, but perhaps this whole thread is seen as provocative. (To be fair to Innogames they are funding and supporting forums which are sometimes quite critical of them)

The link is easy to find on Google. For example it is the second link when searching on Innogames and "Player Council".
 

Far Reach

Conjurer
On the other hand it makes sense to have an NDA when you get access to information about the development process.

Just 1 simple example for why an NDA is needed is lets say they discuss a cool feature and those people share that with players.
Then it turns out that feature is impossible / to expensive to implement, now everyone expects that feature, and is very dissapointed.

Or a change is planned and that change is not beneficial for a sale you had planned, now people do not buy your product because they know it's not a good offer because they have information earlier then you want.

there are 2 simple examples of why NDA's are needed even if it's only about developement.

I absolutely agree, (although note that features are often shared by advance by those who find them in the game files). My view on reading it was that the NDA went beyond what was needed though (possibly just through excessive legal caution).

I'd like to find a way that sensible mutual discussions around game mechanics could be had, whilst ensuring that Inno still retained its intellectual property and business secrets.
 

Killiak

Artisan
So as I am not a legal specialist by any stretch if the imagination.

Me neither. Yet the EU page I linked gives me enough pause to think your legal team is skimming a very, VERY, fine line. These items are not on sale regularly, there is no consistant Elvenar in-game shop that sells this stuff, and your legal team is dancing on the technicality of the item being sold again in the future, maybe.
Personally I think Inno is over that line, but is not big enough to get noticed.

That said, I think all these offers and deals are laughable rip-offs.
 
Last edited:

Deleted User - 341074

Guest
Hey @SoggyShorts, haven't seen you this side of the fence in a while!
This, exactly.
LoL, it's a good thing you are quick with the quote, my post didn't even last 5 minutes before being censored. Now I remember why I'm not here anymore.
 

Deleted User - 341074

Guest
Why did my most recent post get deleted? It wasn't provocative, rude, or anything, just a legit question on how diamonds can be valued differently on different accounts.
 
Top