Basically everybody opposing the idea is saying it will not fit their play style. I was expecting some constructive criticism at least but I was definitely wrong. At the end
@RainbowElvira went to the point that Tournament scores should not be published at all. After that all I can say is why any types of scores should be published. Why we need player rankings or FS rankings at all? Remove all the rankings and we all hold hands and sing Kumbaya together.
I know that Elvenstats has nothing to do with Inno but it is Inno who provides the interface for Elvenstats to get all the information. In that case shutting down the interface will be much effective. So no data will go outside nothing to compare, nothing to worry and we all play happily ever after.
@pompeywolf :
Despite being a member of same FS I completely disagree with you. Tournaments are not all about fighting, catering is also a huge part. One or two troop buildings will not make a huge difference, 90% percent of all Tournaments I play, I play without a single Troop building , especially after Fire Phoenix introduced and so does most of our members. But when we deploy troop buildings we usually deploy a bunch of those.
Finally no one mentioning or against the fact that if you invest hard currency then with diamonds you can roll a lot in crafting until you get lots of troop buildings. But everybody thinks it will be unfair to those not getting 10 chests yet if they choose to do so they can easily achieve by changing their play style. So player preferences directly affects Tournament or FA scores but if your play style is for FA getting additional incentives are OK, but if you choose to be Tournament player that's no go. There is a word for that in the dictionary.
Anyway, I'm retracting my suggestion completely. Thank you all for reminding once more why forums are here for.