Have I seen you here before? To participate in or to create forum discussions, you will need your own forum account. Register your account here!
Remove all the inactives, move 3rd world into 1st and 2nd.
Now that would be constructive and usefull
My overall opinion is to reduce the worlds and merge them. Remove everyone who has not touched the world in 12 months and 90% space will appear everywhere.
Although I agree, I don't think it's a viable option, since there will be players who have cities on both worlds and they then cannot be merged to be in the same world. However, removing all inactives in all worlds (including players who have been inactive >100 days, even thought they've once in their active player life spent money on diamonds) would be an enormous improvement. This would then free up space for new active players, thereby discarding/eliminating a need to create a 4th world.Remove all the inactives, move 3rd world into 1st and 2nd.
Now that would be constructive and usefull
WW farms and push accounts are two very different things. For one, the former are legitimate whereas the latter are not (in theory at least, we all know how it's a de facto tolerated practice). Two, anyone can set up WW farms for free, and it takes quite a bit of effort to bring them to acceptable production level through progression and participation in events on many cities at once. Three, it mitigates the new trend of trying to milk us from every single penny we have, so I for one would welcome a 4th world in order to have another WW farm, and I most certainly wouldn't feel as if I were using push accounts.I'm not exactly seeing the point of having more than 2 worlds available for each player. Seriously, Inno, you struggle to curb certain abuse of game mechanics while at the same time you shove the means to abuse game mechanics in our face. Make up your mind. Gazillions of wishing wells, push accounts etc are mostly a problem because they are possible to be abused across worlds. And you want us to have more of them?