Sir Derf
Adept
So, I've come up with another blind spot in both my personal thought process and what I am aware of in the available discussion and information. How does one evaluate, compare and contrast, the efficiencies of hybrid Pop/Cult buildings?
Obviously, when looking at head-to-head numbers (and by numbers, I mean per-square numbers, not just the overall number), bigger numbers are better.
But the real question is, where in the spectrum of good-better-best is the boundary between wasteful and useful? What efficiency does a balanced pop/cult need to have to be competitive? What is the trade-off between Pop and Culture that describes the curve that separates must-builds from should-disenchants?
More to follow...
Obviously, when looking at head-to-head numbers (and by numbers, I mean per-square numbers, not just the overall number), bigger numbers are better.
But the real question is, where in the spectrum of good-better-best is the boundary between wasteful and useful? What efficiency does a balanced pop/cult need to have to be competitive? What is the trade-off between Pop and Culture that describes the curve that separates must-builds from should-disenchants?
More to follow...