DeletedUser501
Enchanter
Any chance Inno can allow us to have a second Fire Phoenix in the Magic Academy? All this by the incoming phoenix artifacts in the next patch for the Spire.
Have I seen you here before? To participate in or to create forum discussions, you will need your own forum account. Register your account here!
Poor guy, get over it buddy.Maybe they can give it(and 9 artifacts) as a prize each week for getting 19 tournament chests?
Any chance Inno can allow us to have a second Fire Phoenix in the Magic Academy? All this by the incoming phoenix artifacts in the next patch for the Spire.
Nope, that would be about the most unlikely (and dumbest) thing I can imagine lol
Pfffft that was funny and you know it.Poor guy, get over it buddy.
What is it you are objecting to? @Gargon667 saying that the idea is dumb?I just want to make notice of whom and what kind of language some persons are using here in my post
I don´t have a clue of what are you talking about, and I let you know buddy, my post was serious, putting an absurd and out of place topic to make yourself a clown is an offense for the people you´re responding, no need for that. Even more of this when you get offended even more easily, and this is not by someone offending or something but for someone who don´t agree with your arguments.Pfffft that was funny and you know it.
On a serious note as to why this is a horrible idea: The phoenix is massively overpowered and has caused significant balance issues.
Should the developers base prizes and challenges based on players having 50% damage boost or not? How about 100% as you suggest? What about anyone who started playing the week between artifact offers?
There is a major problem and you are asking for it to be increased.
The whole point of having a base and artifacts available for the phoenix is to bring more players up to the same level at ONE each, not make the problem worse.
Yeah, there are a few players with multiple birds, and for the tiny minority of players whom this affects that is an issue. The solution can't possibly be to expand the imbalance to include more players.
The exactly parallelism could be use to: Some players have multiple brown bears, this IS a balancing problem, I´m asking you could also see that you ( the ones that had the possibility to have multiple bears and now don´t want middle gamers or begginers to have multiple phoenix) are being benefited by a balancing issue.What is it you are objecting to? @Gargon667 saying that the idea is dumb?
Some players have a bird and some don't. This creates a balancing problem. You are asking for players to have 2 birds while some don't. This would make the problem worse. Ergo the idea is very clearly a step in the wrong direction.
Maybe it's an ESL issue again, but commonly in English when someone asks a question in such a way it is very much implied that it is actually a request.First, is just a question not even a suggestion
But I listen & even interact with them during Live Q&As and C.managers talk to them even more frequently.second, you´re not a developer, not even the C. Managers are
Wrong. They do in fact have a problem introducing imbalance issues. It's called making mistakes.third devs haven´t had a problem in the past and present to implement imbalanced situations
What? "The game has problems, so why not make it worse?" Really?Yes it would create balance issues, but these balance issues exist right now, and I bet you that devs would create even more in the future, so why not put another imbalanced fire bird if their game is not based in balance at the end?
Despite what you may think, the game does not revolve entirely around the tournament. The imbalance of overpowered pet is a major issue and is absolutely the driving force behind balancing decisions. Why do you think they opened up all 3 building queues? This was obviously an indirect nerf to the brown bear.Tournament right now is not based in those aspects,
Minimal impact. Anyone with a timewarp wonder can overcome this very easily and even early players can craft enough to at least use the second bird for a couple of rounds each week.Another thing you´re not considering is that pet food is limited, a second chicken would be stopped many times for that.
Exactly, so why make it worse?Some players have multiple brown bears, this IS a balancing problem,
Completely wrong assumptions mate. I have exactly zero Brown bears. (and one bird)I´m asking you could also see that you ( the ones that had the possibility to have multiple bears and now don´t want middle gamers or begginers to have multiple phoenix) are being benefited by a balancing issue.
Poor explanation without a single argument (just a personal opinion ) since in the game there are lot of players with 2, or even 3 brown bears (A building even more Imba than a fire phoenix) so by logic devs should either give the possibility to have a second fire phoenix or nerf brown bears (thing that should have been done first before making these absurd changes in the new tourney, that of course you defend but none, or too few do)
Firebirds and brown bears are among the main reasons why tourneys needed to be nerfed in the first place, because of these 2 buildings (and of course other things as well) the old tourneys had become so ridiculously easy that they needed to be made more difficult. If you now added more firebirds and brown bears the new tourneys would have to be nerfed again.
I completely agree... Ideally, each player should have only one copy of evolving building and ofc opportunity to evolve them. Players come and go... Otherwise this game can become uplayable if those exceptionally rare opportunities to win/get evolves are missed. If phoenix evolves will be offered for few weeks in the spire, this will not solve these issues. I would be keen to see rather different offering than random luck in the spire for a limited time.
It could solve the issue if it is a recurring thing, like let´s say 4 weeks 4 times a year, that way everybody can get the artifacts and slowly evolve their firebird crafted in the MA, it does have the advantage of being independent of the phoenix events, which may not be around forever...
For people with a Firebird already evolved it of course rather useless (unless they want the other birds evolved as well) which is why the number of weeks per year has to be limited.
But I listen & even interact with them during Live Q&As and C.managers talk to them even more frequently.
Wrong. They do in fact have a problem introducing imbalance issues. It's called making mistakes.
What? "The game has problems, so why not make it worse?" Really?
Despite what you may think, the game does not revolve entirely around the tournament. The imbalance of overpowered pet is a major issue and is absolutely the driving force behind balancing decisions. Why do you think they opened up all 3 building queues? This was obviously an indirect nerf to the brown bear.
Minimal impact. Anyone with a timewarp wonder can overcome this very easily and even early players can craft enough to at least use the second bird for a couple of rounds each week.
Exactly, so why make it worse?
Completely wrong assumptions mate. I have exactly zero Brown bears. (and one bird)
That's still not the point. Even if inno sucks at balancing (which we agree that they do) I don't want it to be worse.Once again, InnoGames really care very less in fixing balancing problems.
Isn't it a 4/13 chance that you get 4x per day? That's almost 7 per week.Not at all, pet food is a damn hard resource to get
I think this is where we differ most. I could not possibly care less about the handful of players who have 3 bears.For a second just imagine what a top tourney player would have in its city: 2-3 brown bears, possibly 1 polar bear, 1 phoenix and there could be more than that........ This 2nd bird with some luck, in my personal case, would give me some sort of equality for those playing with several brown bears.
I'm the original beta tester for Elvenstats.BTW, why your portrait has a golden circular border and a little heart in ElvenStats?