Have I seen you here before? To participate in or to create forum discussions, you will need your own forum account. Register your account here!
I actually asked support this very thing, Im happy to confirm that that the bonus does stack, 2No. lvl10 brown bears give 100% bonus when both fed- glI’ve just obtained a 2nd brown bear as a prize, if I put this bear in, will the effect from feeding stack?
Eg 25% on first bear plus 25% on second ... would I get 50% or would only one bear count?
I wouldn't do that.when I get some space he will go in
I wouldn't do that.
The number of soldiers doesn't matter much in the provinces - you can't send more than you can.
In the provinces, the quality of the soldiers matters - how much health they have and what attack / defeat they have.
Use the space for the second bear for something more useful.
Could not disagree more.I wouldn't do that.
The number of soldiers doesn't matter much in the provinces - you can't send more than you can.
In the provinces, the quality of the soldiers matters - how much health they have and what attack / defeat they have.
Use the space for the second bear for something more useful.
And its only 9 tiles. I went for as many bears as I can get any I don't regret them. Even without feeding each bear is miles better than eg a Valorian Valor.
This is very primitive logic. Quantity never makes quality.Could not disagree more.
The number of soldiers do matter, the more soldiers you get the more rounds and provinces of of tournament you can get. And its only 9 tiles. I went for as many bears as I can get any I don't regret them. Even without feeding each bear is miles better than eg a Valorian Valor.
I doubt you have more battles won, I'm not trying to brag so sorry if it comes across that way but last week for the first time I scored the most points in the Tournament, 16050 points in Crystal facing the three-star Frogs: https://www.elvenstats.com/tournaments - So I think by definition I won more battles last week than anyone else on EN1 Server at least and if anyone can do that without losing any troops then that'd be impressive. That was done by doing Provinces 1-9 at 6* and 10-73 at 5*This is very primitive logic. Quantity never makes quality.
I prefer such battles:
View attachment 4022
So with less soldiers I will have more battles won.
Obviously your battles involve a lot of losses. Which is the result of weak soldiers.
Wait, let me get this straight... pandas are more space-efficient than any other unit-production buildings and on top of that they provide population, more culture and a timed bonus which is 10% higher than a level 30 Simia, and stacks. Both me and @randblade use "primitive" tactics but somehow we both scored over 16k in the last tournament and hold an average tournament score which is more than 4 times yours... yet somehow our logic is "primitive"? Funny. I thought a primitive logic would result in worse results, not in overwhelmingly better results.This is very primitive logic. Quantity never makes quality.
I prefer such battles:
View attachment 4022
So with less soldiers I will have more battles won.
Obviously your battles involve a lot of losses. Which is the result of weak soldiers.
We have 15 types of squads, none of which include machine guns.Well, it's primitive.
Because you bet on quantity.
You are trying to convince the audience that it is better to have a hundred soldiers with bows and spears than one with a machine gun.