Sir Derf
Adept
Oh, so it's better to drive forward in fear of the unknown?
Yes, they didn't try the changes out in Beta first. But, they are not required to do that.
Yes, they didn't announce the change before it started on the Live server. But, they are not required to announce changes.
Yes, they didn't apologize for the above. But, they are not required to do that, either.
Now, we could dislike any, or all, of the above. We can feel this is unfair, or unprofessional, or unethical, or impolite, or other such. We are welcome to our opinions. And to express our opinions.
And we can talk about how INNO should have handled this, and how they should handle this in the future. And we can react to the above, boycotting FAs, or quitting the game. Again, all fine.
Separate from how the change was made, there is the change itself, making several badges cost more, and in the case of Sacks of Gold, 4x more expensive.
Yes, this is a change to the FA. But, they are not required to keep the FA unchanging.
Again, we can dislike any, or all, of these changes. We can feel this is unfair, or unprofessional, or unethical, or impolite, or other such. Again, we are welcome to our opinions. And to express our opinions.
And we can talk about what changes INNO should have made, and how they should further change this in the future. And we can react to these changes, boycotting FAs, or quitting the game. Again, all fine.
Separate from all of that, we have the current, new, state of the game. Independent of all of the above, for those who don't choose to boycott FAs, or quit the game, we can discuss how to adjust to the current, new, state of the game. We've got the past experience and past discussions for understanding the past iterations of the FA, we can discuss the ramifications of these new costs, and possible reactions to adjust game play to these rules in the future.
Yes, they didn't try the changes out in Beta first. But, they are not required to do that.
Yes, they didn't announce the change before it started on the Live server. But, they are not required to announce changes.
Yes, they didn't apologize for the above. But, they are not required to do that, either.
Now, we could dislike any, or all, of the above. We can feel this is unfair, or unprofessional, or unethical, or impolite, or other such. We are welcome to our opinions. And to express our opinions.
And we can talk about how INNO should have handled this, and how they should handle this in the future. And we can react to the above, boycotting FAs, or quitting the game. Again, all fine.
Separate from how the change was made, there is the change itself, making several badges cost more, and in the case of Sacks of Gold, 4x more expensive.
Yes, this is a change to the FA. But, they are not required to keep the FA unchanging.
Again, we can dislike any, or all, of these changes. We can feel this is unfair, or unprofessional, or unethical, or impolite, or other such. Again, we are welcome to our opinions. And to express our opinions.
And we can talk about what changes INNO should have made, and how they should further change this in the future. And we can react to these changes, boycotting FAs, or quitting the game. Again, all fine.
Separate from all of that, we have the current, new, state of the game. Independent of all of the above, for those who don't choose to boycott FAs, or quit the game, we can discuss how to adjust to the current, new, state of the game. We've got the past experience and past discussions for understanding the past iterations of the FA, we can discuss the ramifications of these new costs, and possible reactions to adjust game play to these rules in the future.